 |
| Lentils (Lens culinaris). Source: Wikipedia. |
By Gundhramns Hammer & Salvatore Scimino
October 23, 2015
In Europe, and just about any country that follows the elite´s Industrial Age rules and methods, agriculture has been elevated to such heights that what humans now eat is contaminated food.
Today, despite the mumbo jumbo that “it has been improved”, what we eat is fucking shit.
Even though eating this food might not kill you instantly or immediately, in the long run it will.
Forget about hormesis whose proponents or supporters are one way or another nothing but mere tentacles belonging to the same economic interests from the global chemical industry which controls the pesticide factories worldwide.
It does not matter how you look at it. The allowed standards of levels of contaminants (MRLs= maximun residue levels or legal levels) in the food mean nothing, for in the end what we are really dealing with is toxic food.
It is edible toxic shit, packaged and sold as processed “food”. Since we are not writing for the world´s science priesthood but the public why beat about the bush.
Despite the abracadabra from the experts, who are people usually
paid or supported with research funds by the powerful chemical industry
directly or indirectly, toxic food is now an ever-present part of our
so-called “quality of life”.
Thus, it is not surprising that people whose daily life depend on
medications to look “healthy” and “gorgeous” and lead a “normal” life are quite common in Europe
or anywhere else where people have adopted the Western habits and can afford
them.
These people – i.e. walking zombies - are so fucked up that without their daily ration of medicines they would not be able to function at all to lead a “productive life” and be vampirised by the system!
These people – i.e. walking zombies - are so fucked up that without their daily ration of medicines they would not be able to function at all to lead a “productive life” and be vampirised by the system!
In spite of the charming packaging at the suppermarkets or the
sophisticated arrangements and fancy adornments when served at any expensive normal restaurant or a narco-restaurant when you eat out, European foodstuffs are contaminated with residues
of numerous chemicals. This is a scientific fact (Table
1). Please read the European Food Safety Authority (2015)´s report on
pesticide residues in food in the EU.
Table 1. Pesticides detected in plants
products in the European Union. Source: European
Union Safety Authority (2015). Click on image to enlarge.
European foodstuffs are so contaminated that sometimes not even decomposer animals such as slugs and snails in the garden will eat them. Only fungi and bacteria will get to them. And only after some time, not immediately.
Mon dieu, mon Capitaine, this is what is now called “developed agriculture” or “industrial agriculture”.
Oui, mon ami!
So, here we report what happened to the authors upon eating some of this normal “developed” food: Lentils (Lens culinaris) bought in France.
The case of the French lentils
In May 2014, we bought a pound of supposedly “organic” lentils (Lens culinaris) at a supermarket in Oloron, France.
We must admit that the lentils were neatly packaged, contained in a extremely attractive cardboard box, with a small and transparent plastic window on the top on both sides, so the consumer could see the grains inside.
We put the box of lentils aside on a shelf for a while.
After more than a year of being on the shelf at home, the boxed lentils still had no signs of any worms and fungi getting to them.
But then, on August 15, 2015, we decided to cook them. And violà! They were ready to eat in less than in an hour!
They smelled good and were very tasty! So we decided to eat some of them. We ate a dish of these lentils at noon. The only different food we had during that day.
But these lentils were so “developed” that they made us quite ill upon eating them!
We experienced skin rushes on the chest and neck, mild stomachache, scalp and butt itch and mild, short-lived bronchitis, mild headaches and other medical symptoms due to the lentils since they had been the only different food we had during that day.
The following day the medical troubles continued. We had mild headaches and other medical symptoms.
Based on our personal observations, the effects of consumption of these “developed” lentils from France are summarised on Table 2:
Table 2. Medical effects of consuming contaminated cooked lentils (Lens culinaris) bought in France. Data
based on personal observations (4 persons; average age, 46 years). Time has
been summarised and rounded off. Table constructed by the authors (Gundhramns Hammer &
Salvatore Scimino).
Medical symptom
|
Lapse of time after consumption
[hours (h) or minutes (min)]
|
Level of effect
|
Duration of symptom
[hours (h) or minutes (min)]
|
Scalp itchiness
|
15 min
|
Severe
|
8 h
|
Cutaneous chest itchiness
|
1 h
|
Severe
|
12 h
|
Facial allergy (redness, itchiness)
|
58 min
|
Mild
|
23 h
|
Eye irritation (redness, itchiness)
|
18 min
|
Severe
|
5 h
|
Itchiness behind ears
|
1 h
|
Severe
|
7 h
|
Neck rush (below the chin)
|
1 h
|
Severe
|
9 h
|
Cutanous back itchiness
|
1 h
|
Moderate
|
6 h
|
Perianal itchiness
|
2 h
|
Mild
|
2 h
|
Headache
|
12 h
|
mild
|
3 h
|
Stomachache
|
2 h
|
Mild
|
5 h
|
Crotch itchiness
|
2 h
|
Mild
|
2 h
|
Articulation pain (fingers, knee)
|
3 h
|
Mild
|
4 h
|
Dizziness
|
12 min
|
Mild
|
5 h
|
Bronchitis
|
15 min
|
Mild
|
1 h
|
Sneezing
|
5 min
|
Moderate
|
20 min
|
Irritated colon
|
12 h
|
Severe
|
10 h
|
Leg cramps
|
10 h
|
Moderate
|
4 h
|
We are vegetarian, frugal and thus are not into crowding and piling our eating dish. We only consume two or three different food items at a time with each meal which usually are 2/day.
Besides, we had neither breakfast nor dinner that day.
We watch carefully what we eat and keep a record of all the reactions
different foods produce on us. We are our own guinea pigs every time we eat.
We are people who eat to live and not live to eat.
Naturally, we cannot discount the age-related factor and age vulnerability to environmental chemicals in our case. Weiss (2013) discusses this aspect in great detail.
Although children and young people might react differently, for their body tissues can compensate any wear and tear faster, nonetheless the consumption of contaminated food can affect anyone from any age group.
Nowadays, children and even adults suffer from numerous types of allergies; many of such ailments are directly related to food. Unfortunately, most physicians tend still do not make the connection food-disease.
Based on the symptoms we experienced, we have concluded that these French lentils were not “organic” and were contaminated with residues of pesticides and perhaps even mycotoxins.
Naturally, we cannot discount the age-related factor and age vulnerability to environmental chemicals in our case. Weiss (2013) discusses this aspect in great detail.
Although children and young people might react differently, for their body tissues can compensate any wear and tear faster, nonetheless the consumption of contaminated food can affect anyone from any age group.
Nowadays, children and even adults suffer from numerous types of allergies; many of such ailments are directly related to food. Unfortunately, most physicians tend still do not make the connection food-disease.
Based on the symptoms we experienced, we have concluded that these French lentils were not “organic” and were contaminated with residues of pesticides and perhaps even mycotoxins.
Further analysis will throw more evidence on this case.
But to call these French lentils “organic”
is beyond the limits stipulated by the law.
Thus, this would fall in the category of fooling consumers, especially those concerned about their health and who want to eat only real organic in a world that has been overtaken to a great deal of extent by large chemical corporations.
What is behind the lentils?
Obviously after what had happened to us we had no more of these lentils and left them in the pot without boiling them at all overnight. We wanted to see what would happen to them with the passage of time.
After three days of staying in the pot, the lentils were still fine, still edible! They presented no fermentation or any other signs of decomposition.
Then, we asked ourselves: What the fuck do these “organic” lentils contain that will not rot?
Thus, this would fall in the category of fooling consumers, especially those concerned about their health and who want to eat only real organic in a world that has been overtaken to a great deal of extent by large chemical corporations.
What is behind the lentils?
Obviously after what had happened to us we had no more of these lentils and left them in the pot without boiling them at all overnight. We wanted to see what would happen to them with the passage of time.
After three days of staying in the pot, the lentils were still fine, still edible! They presented no fermentation or any other signs of decomposition.
Then, we asked ourselves: What the fuck do these “organic” lentils contain that will not rot?
We have not analysed them chemically to see exactly what they kind of pesticide residues they contained.
We are working on it.
But we do know for sure that lentils are attacked by numerous pests
(insects, fungi, etc.) in the field (pre-harvest) and when stored
(post-harvest; e.g., seed beetles) as well.
So, the
intensive production of this crop is difficult. It requires the use of
pesticides, synthetic fertilizers and the input of other chemicals such as “desiccants”, which are applied to “dry down” and create uniformity of
plant material at harvest time. These chemical products also assist in
pre-harvest weed control (Saskatchewan Pulse Growers News, 2013, 2015).
For example,
according to the Saskatchewan Pulse Growers News (2013), these products include
diquat (Reglone), glyphosate (Roundup), saflufenacil
(HEAT), and glufosinate in Canada.
But these
pesticides are not the only ones used on lentil farming. There are more. For
example, dimethoate, bifenthrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, imidacloprid,
cyfluthrin are used for insect control.
The lentil´s
weed control treatment includes herbicides such as imazethapyr, triallate,
metribuzin, sethoxydim, pendimethalin, quizalofop-P-ethyl,
amongst others.
Lentil crops are attacked by various types of fungi (Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Sclerotium,
Pythium, etc.) The choice treatment for these pests is another pesticide: thiabenzadole.
On the other
hand, growing pulses the “organic” or “ecological” way has its
own difficulties as well.
This
is something experienced and “certified organic farmers” know about
quite well. For example, in Saskatchewan, Canada, where pulse farming is done “organically”
on a large scale.
However,
whether organic or not, no farmer can ever escape from the problem of weeds.
Lentils
are poor competitors with weeds. So the “organic” farmer must depend on
adequate seed density and precise harrowing in between the rows of the crop.
Next,
the farmer must count on an integral pest control. This may involved planting
genetically modified (transgenic or point mutated) seeds resistant to
herbicides (e.g, Clearfield), inoculaing seeds wih Rhizobium bacteria
for nitrogen fixation, using organic or inorganic pesticides and other
techiques allowed by the certifying company or the government.
Thus,
in the end, industrial “organic” farming usually means input of man-made
chemicals including herbicides - for example imazamox, imazethapyr,
sethoxydim on lentil crops - applied according to “recommended”
or “agreed upon” quantities and methods by the farmer.
So,
if it comes from industrial agriculture, the label “organic” on the
product often means nothing at all to the consumer because it is far from it.
The
term “organic” may simply be a convenient marketing tool.
And
as far as the “organic certification” is concerned, the system may be a scam and the "organic" regulations only a mere tentacle of the prevailing economic interests which are in control of the
global food industry.
This system may lend itself to the powerful global corporate interests.
In our case, these French lentils may have been organically-produced as labelled on the
package.
But as to
whether they were wholly organic all the way up to the consumer is
another matter.
To begin
with, after harvesting a crop, the farmer must store the grains. This
post-harvest storage means that chemical treatment must be applied to the plant product.
There are
other methods (irradiation, heat, modified atmosphere, etc.), called “integrated pest management” (IPM)
programmes (Subramanyam & Hagstrum, 2000), to avoid any contamination
(chemical or pests) but they are more expensive because it involves investing
in adapting the storage facilities.
In other
words, and talking in fancy language, the storage plant will require expensive
retroffiting towards “sustainability”, if possible, to meet today´s
tendencies.
Thus, most
farmers use synthetic chemicals during the post-harvest. It is the quickest and
cheapest method.
Here lies
the problem of organically or
ecologically-produced. It breaks down at this stage.
Why?
Because of
various reasons.
First.
Because crops which are produced on such a massive industrial scale, once
harvested they have to be selected, dried and stored in huge metallic
cylindrical containers (silos) where farmers will apply pesticides (triflumuron,
cypermethrin) and fungicides (thiabendazole) to the grains or
cereals, whose humidity content must be 14% or less, otherwise they would lose
the harvested product; thereby losing a lot of money. Something any farmer will
not take a chance on or risk.
Big farmers
are in this business to make money. Big money, that is.
And in a
globalised economy, in some cases, we are really dealing with farmers who are
into this business not because they enjoy farming but to do some money laundering. This is another dimension. This is called narco-agriculture. And those that are in this can be then called narco-farmers.
But this is another matter we will delve into on another occasion.
But the
lentil farmer worries have not finished yet. For instance, he must keep crop spoilage at bay. To begin with, he has to worry about the water content of the harvested crop at storage time.
Moreover, since lentils are miniature universes in themselves, made up of living cells, their respiration process must be taken into account when stored as well.
Moreover, since lentils are miniature universes in themselves, made up of living cells, their respiration process must be taken into account when stored as well.
For example,
too much water content in the seeds will lead to high temperatures in the farm bin or silo,
which in turn will activate the bacteria and fungi spores on the seed coats and
as a result the farmer may lose the entire crop to spoilage or end up with tonnes of
discoloured or spotted seeds which have no value in the market whatsoever.
Excesive drying at the storage facility or if the
harvested seeds were too dried when stored, the result may be the opposite:
cracked seed coats or seeds, making the product unappealing to the buyers.
These are
just a few of the things that can give farmers nightmares.
Obviously,
seed storage is a science in itself. And big farmers must know how to deal with
the end of their lines.
Second.
There is the plastic wrapping used in the food industry. Such plastics contain
phthalates esters which are highly toxic organic substances.
Third. We
have to remember that tractors used in agriculture fart toxic fumes as they go
along on the field at harvesting time; thereby spreading their crap on the
picked crop.
What was
once mule or horse farts when tilling the land has now become a river of toxic
gases from a combustion machine, the tractor!
Four. We
have air pollution such as contrails and chemtrails, the particulate matter
(barium, aluminum, etc.) from the global elite´s geoengineering experiment
which is brought down on the crop by the rain or the wind.
And five. Do
not forget the ground pollution from vehicular transportation to the
distributing depot and from here to the supermarket or grocery stores. This
means more gasoline or diesel farts from the trucks and the cigarette smoke if
the driver smokes. To this we must add the smoke coming from the other
thousands of circulating vehicles on the highway.
But the
problem does not end here.
How about
the problem of the mycotoxins and insects during storage, the smoke from the
thousands of industry smokestacks and the radioactive fallout from the nuclear
disasters (e.g., Chernobyl, Fukushima)?
Is this “progress”?
So, by the
time the consumer gets the food at the supermarket, even if it has been
produced using organic or ecological methods, there is always the risk of
contamination one way or another along the way.
So much for
industrial “organic” or “ecologic” food in Europe, mon ami.
Even when
you grow it in your own backyard or garden and do not apply any synthetic
chemicals to control “pests”, you
will still get a lot of crap falling on your crop, for example the pollution
coming from the circulating cars, cigarette smokers passing-by, contrails and
chemtrails from airplanes, etc.
But let us
get back to our story of the French lentils.
What
happened to them?
Unfortunately,
we had to throw them away.
But before
we did we put some outside in the garden in a small tray a friend gave us. An
experiment based on the assumption that many nonhuman vertebrate animals (e.g.,
mice) have a different set of hepatic enzymes to deal with substances that
would be otherwise toxic to us, humans.
And as we
have said before, slugs [e.g., Limax maximus (Limacidae); Arion ater (Arionidae)]
and snails [e.g., Helix aspersa
(Helicidae)] came to the
dish that contained the lentils but did not eat them. Neither did feral cats,
mice, birds and a few other animals that visit our garden (personal
observations).
After a few
minutes of crawling on the lentils and tasting them, the mollusks in particular
lost interest and left.
According to
Dr. Paul Bartsch´s experiments, slugs such as Limax
maximus are “extraordinarily sensitive to gases”, capable of
detecting one molecule in 10.000.000!, including those “which emanate
from its food” (Buller, 1922).
In
other words, the slugs were smarter than us!
The daring
cats (3) that did try these lentils got mildly sick, vomiting twice after
ingesting the lentils (personal observations).
After a whole week of being outside and drained whenever it rained, looking almost exactly
the same way we put them out, here is what these lentils look like (Fig. 1).
Look at them carefully and you will see bare traces of tough fungi on them after seven weeks of being cooked (Fig. 2).
 |
| Figure 1. The French "organic" lentils (Lens culinaris) after a week of cooking and left outside in the garden. |
 |
| Figure 2. The French "organic" lentils (Lens culinaris) after 7 weeks of cooking. |
And today (October 23, 2015), this is what they look like (Fig. 3):
 |
| Figure 3. The French "organic" lentils (Lens culinaris) as of today (October 23, 2015). |
So far, these lentils have turned out to be indestructible!
We did see a
housefly (Musca domestica) laid eggs on the lentils but only two larvae
hatched on September 25, 2015.
But the larvae died the following day.
It could be
that the plastic tray is giving off residues of phthalate which get into the
lentils making them unpalatable or more toxic.
We will go
ahead and change the recipient. They will be put on a porcelain dish to see
what happens to them. We will let you know the results later on.
Conclusion
These particular so-called “organic” (black) lentils from France were toxic.
These particular so-called “organic” (black) lentils from France were toxic.
This is
definitely toxic food! This is alien food! Here is food ready for a trip to
planet Mars! Here food to last a thousand years!
And we are
glad no animal died from eating bits of it!!
Folks, this
is developed agriculture in Europe.
And since
during this century Europe has set the industrial pace in agriculture, by now
almost everyone has fallen into this trap.
The experts
called it the “Green Revolution” when
in reality was, and still is, a Petro-derived
Revolution.
This “Green Revolution” has lead, amongst other things, to a large alteration of the global nitrogen
biogeochemistry.
According to
Vitousek (1994), human activiy has changed the planetary nitrogen cycle to such
an extent that more nitrogen is fixed
annually by humanity – chiefly due to nitrogen fertilizer use, plantations of
legume crops and as a by-product of fossil fuel combustion – than by all
natural pathways combined. This added nitrogen upsets the chemical balance in
the atmosphere and the aquatic ecosystems, contributes to eutrophication of the
biosphere and affects the biodiversity in the most affected areas.
And this
will get worse as the human population increases. Since people will need or
demand more food (to eat or waste), growing more food on a resource-limited
planet will mean only one thing, amongst others: further alteration on the
nitrogen cycle on the planet.
What a
catch-22 trap!
As far as
food is concerned, we have no doubts that, despite the rough life they had,
Pleistocene humans probably ate better than we do today in many aspects, when
they had the chance, of course. At least they ate wholesome, totally natural
food and not this sophisticated packaged crap we now call “food”.
So, it is
not surprising that today there are so many people full of cancer, with an
undermined intestinal microbiota, suffering from immune or hormone problems,
overweight or terribly obese, getting fucked by a heart attack and dropping
dead like flies on the streets, and plenty of folks of all ages going around
with all sorts of ailments and diseases, many of which are directly linked to
food, even when a lot of medical doctors do not have the guts or knowledge to
admit it, for if they did so they would be immediately fired from their greasy
job at the human repair shop, the hospital.
We all know
that one of the rules of slaving away for the dark lords who own and control
the global system is to obey. And naturally, consume!
Only the
brave and/or old physicians, those approaching the kicking-bucket dateline,
dare to speak up.
Furthemore,
remember, today´s food industry is controlled by a bunch of giant multinationals around the world (Fig. 4; Video 1). And these are extremely powerful.
 |
| Figure 4. Chart showing how 10 corporations control what we buy at the stores. Source: Zero Hedge. Click on image to enlarge. |
Video 1. 10 corporations control the world´s food supply. Uploaded by Elite NWO Agenda.
These corporations can
make or break any scientist in this business. They also can and will do the same to any
rival business that dares to challenge their power on the same turf by that
matter, if they see it convenient. Money is the name of their game.
This is why
we seldom get clear information on this matter, food. We too often get a lot of
diluted information, contradictory data or data that cancel out one another the
more you dig into this world.
Internet is
full of this kind of information. There already is more than enough to keep you
searching forever, adding up, substracting, cancelling out and, of course, in
doubt for a long time, especially if you are not an expert or have no expertise
whatsoever.
And this is
the idea: To keep you dancing under the global elite´s anti-biospherical
umbrella and eating its crap we have been brainwashed to crave for.
This means
that when you get sick you have to go to the hospital, usually controlled by
the same elite, to push further your meeting with the Parcae, where you will
get drugged galore to survive and come out like a zombie, a full-fledged cyborg
or missing half your intestine or whatever the experts saw it necessary or
unnecessary to cut, hoping to get a good economic slice of the big med-pharma
cake.
And back to
square one.
How did we
get in this mess?
Obviously,
this is a long story and we are not here to get involved in this. We would
never finish.
Anyway, what
do you think?
Have you had
a similar experience in Europe or somewhere else in the world after eating some
“developed” food?
Unfortunately,
as we said before, most physicians do not relate an ailment or disease to the
type of food consumed.
So, keep
track of what you eat and get informed before you go to see the human repairman,
the physician. This way you will not be tricked, for these experts are
basically trained to cut and stitch, wih only around 5% having taken a
nutrition course in their fucking student lives.
Keep in
mind, in what we eat, there lies our health.
And there
also lies the gist of our present problem.
When it
comes to food growing, like in the story of “Aladdin
and the Magic Lamp”, we have exchanged our old but good lamp for a new but
lousy lamp.
It is too
late to get it back.
Because of
our love affair to live in fucking crowded megalopolies where there are more
chances to work to make a living, to fuck or get fucked, we humans - naked apes
(Homo insapiens) that basically function on the least effort gear - have
allowed mega-corporations to grow and control our food.
And as you
all well know, these bastards can get away with murder.
Thus, it is
not surprising we have ended up where we are today, with piles of different
kinds of attractive toxic food to choose from and buy if we have the money in
the pocket at the supermarkets and, when we go to the bathroom, we may be so
constipated that shitting has become a painful battle because our colons are
extremely overloaded or decayed by cancer.
When our
bodies cannot handle this toxic cycle any longer, we hit the hospital to get
fixed or become a heavy piece of meat for the funeral folks to be shipped to
the burning kiln or thrown underground to become fodder for the worms and
bacteria.
End of the
line.
Folks, it is
true, something the constant brainwashing from the media or the mumbo jumbo
from corporation-supported experts keep telling us all the time with fancy talk such as that “today´s
food is more wholesome than ever before”, that “developed” food can be
beautiful, appealing to our chemtrailled or chemically altered psyches, delicious to eat over
and over and highly addictive but let us face it, we are now eating our own
crap.
What a
blooming pity! Or shall we say what a blooming “puta”!
NB. On
another occasion, if we have another occasion, we will relate to you the story
of how we got well again after eating the French "organic" lentils.
We will also continue with our series: Developed Agriculture II.
Till then!
We will also continue with our series: Developed Agriculture II.
Till then!
References
Anonymous (2003). Pest Management Strategic Plan for Pulse Crops (Chickpeas,Lentils, and Dry Peas) in the United States and Canada. Summary of a workshop
held on June 26-27, 2002, Saskatoon, Canada. 66 p.
Bhatnagar A. (Ed.) (2011). Environmental Cardiology:
Pollution and Heart Disease. Issues in Toxicology Nº 8. RSC Publishing, Thomas
Graham House, Cambridge, UK. 390 p.
Buller A.H.R. (1922). Slugs as Mycophagists. Chapter
VIII. Researches on Fungi 2: 212-235.
D´Mello J.O.F. (Ed.) (2003). Food Safety: Contaminants
and Toxins. CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. 452 p.
Erskine W., Muehlbauer F., Sarker A. & Sharma B.
(Eds.) (2009). Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. CABI, CAB International,
Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK. 457 p.
European Food Safety Authority (2015). The
2013 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J., 13 (3):
4038, 169 p. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4038
Fernandez-Cornejo J., Nehring R., Osteen C., Wechsler
S., Martin A. & Vialou A. (2014). Pesticide Use in U.S. Agriculture: 21
Selected Crops, 1960-2008. EIB-124, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic
Research Service, Economic Information Bulletin Number 124: 1-80.
GRDC (Grains Research & Development Corporation)
(2011). Stored Grain Pests Identification. Queensland, Australia. 20 p.
Hill D.S. (2003). Pests of Stored Foodstuffs and Their
Control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 476 p.
Knight R. (Ed.) (2000). Linking Research and Marketing
Opportunities for Pulses in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the Third
International Food Legumes Research Conference. Current Plant Science and
Biotecnhology in Agriculture Volume 34. Springer Science+Business Media,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 705 p.
Labeyrie V. (Ed.) (1981). The Ecology of Bruchids
Attacking Legumes (Pulses). Proceedings of the International Symposium held at
Tours (France), April 16-19, 1980. Series Entomologica Volume 19.
Springer-Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 233 p.
Marrs T.C. (Ed.) (2012). Mammalian Toxicology of
Insecticides. Issues in Toxicology Mº 12. RSC Publishing, Thomas Graham House,
Cambridge, UK. 490 p.
Mills J.T. (1989). Spoilage and Heating of Stored Agricultural Products: Prevention, Detection and Control. Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Ottawa, Canada. Publication 1823E. 97 p.
Mills J.T. (1989). Spoilage and Heating of Stored Agricultural Products: Prevention, Detection and Control. Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Ottawa, Canada. Publication 1823E. 97 p.
Pongratz I & Vickström Bergander L. (Eds.) (2012).
Hormone-Disruptive Chemical Contaminants in Food. Issues in Toxicology Nº 11.
RSC Publishing, Thomas Graham House, Cambridge, UK. 236 p.
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers News (2013). Grower Advisory: Be Aware of Market Risks Involved with Desiccant Use This Season.
Saskatchewan, Canada. 2 p.
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers News (2015). Be Aware of Market Risks Involved with Desiccant Use This Season. Saskatchewan, Canada. 2
p.
Schrenk D. (Ed.) (2012). Chemical Contaminants and
Residues in Food. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and
Nutrition: Number 235. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK. 577 p.
Siantar D.P., Trucksess M.W., Scott P.M. & Herman
E.M. (Eds.) (2008). Food Contaminants: Mycotoxins and Food Allergens. ACS
Symposium Series 1001. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA. 543 p.
Summerfield R.J. (Ed.) (1988). World Crops: Cool
Season Food Legumes: A Global Perspective of the Problems and Prospects for
Crop Improvement in Pea, Lentil, Faba bean and Chickpea. Proceedings of the
International Food Legume Research Conference on Pea, Lentil, Faba bean and
Chickpea held at the Sheraton Hotel, Spokane, Washington, USA. Current Plant
Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture Volume 5. Kluwer Academic Publisher,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 1179 p.
Stapples C.A. (Ed.) (2003). Phthalate Esters. The
Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Volume 3, Part Q. Springer-Verlag,
Heidelberg, Germany. 349 p.
Subramanyam B.
& Hagstrum D.W. (Eds.) (1996). Integrated Management of Insects on Stored
Products. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 432 p.
Subramanyam B. & Hagstrum D.W. (Eds.) (2000).
Alternatives to Pesticides in Stored-product IPM. Springer Science+Business
Media LLC, New York, NY, USA. 437 p.
Tweedy B.G., Dishburger H.J., Ballatine L.G., McCarthy
J. & Murphy J. (Eds.) (1991). Pesticide Residues and Food Safety: A Harvest
of Viewpoints. ACS Symposium Series 446. American Chemical Society, Washington,
DC, USA. 359 p.
Vitousek P. M. (1994). Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change. Ecology, 75 (7): 1861-1876.
Watson D.H. (Ed.) (2001). Food Chemical Safety. Volume
1: Contaminants. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Abington Hall, Cambridge,
England. 322 p.
Watson D.H. (Ed.) (2002). Food Chemical Safety. Volume
1: Additives. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Abington Hall, Cambridge, England.
308 p.
Weiss B. (Ed.) (2013). Aging and Vulnerability to
Environmental Chemicals: Age-related Disorders and their Origins in
Environmental Exposures. Issues in Toxicology Nº 16. RSC Publishing, Thomas Graham
House, Cambridge, UK. 484 p.
Witcombe J.R. & Erskine W. (Eds.) (1984). Genetic
Resources and Their Exploitation – Chickpeas, Faba beans and Lentils. Advances
in Agricultural Technology. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague,
The Netherlands. 256 p.
Yadav S.S., McNeil D.L. & Stevenson P.C. (Eds.)
(2007). Lentil: An Ancient Crop for Modern Times. Springer, Dordrecht, The
Netherlands. 461 p.
